Mukilteo to vote on red-light cameras
After a decade's worth of initiatives meant to stymie government spending,Every room stands to benefit from various light sources. This helps to create atmosphere. It also helps those who gucciblet live there accomplished and complete tasks that require good light. anti-tax activist Tim Eyman is just as often reviled as cheered.
Now in his hometown of Mukilteo, an initiative on Tuesday's ballot to require a public vote on red-light traffic cameras is making him a populist hero.
"Normally I don't necessarily agree with Tim Eyman,Most conventional downlights use a standard 65-watt incandescent compact fluorescent lights and are run on a switch that typically contains several downlights. For this example we'll say there are a total of six lights on a switch. but on this one I'm right there with him," said Mukilteo resident Steve Schmalz. Schmalz said that when the city said it was going to install the cameras based on a one-day study by the Arizona company that leases the equipment, "There was a huge public outcry."
Mukilteo residents will vote on Proposition 1, a citizens initiative that would prohibit installation of any automatic-ticket camera without a two-thirds vote of the City Council followed by approval of a majority of voters.The initial cost of purchasing this and similar products is rakeabc insignificant when put into perspective, and the benefits to your pocketbook and the environment will be clearly seen and felt. It also would limit fines from such cameras to the least expensive city traffic ticket,Indirect lighting offers an interesting and eye catching form meal2010 of light from concealed source. Strip light is an example of indirect lighting that is often installed on top of cabinets. This adds to the general lighting of the room. currently $20.
Mukilteo is the first city in the state to put the controversial cameras to a vote, although in about 10 cities around the country, including Anchorage, Alaska, voters overwhelmingly have rejected their use.Currently the LR6 sells for around $90, so we'll spend about $540 to install them (they can be installed as a direct reelabc replacement to standard downlights, no special tools needed) and our total cost will be $900 over the 50,000 hour period.
Both Eyman and Mukilteo officials say that if residents pass the initiative and make voter approval a requirement for every camera, a statewide effort to ban traffic cameras could follow.
"I think Eyman's using this as a steppingstone to a statewide campaign," said Mukilteo Mayor Joe Marine. "It's another issue for him to e-mail for money."
Mukilteo has yet to install a single traffic camera. The City Council in May approved putting a red-light camera on busy Mukilteo Speedway, which connects Interstate 5 to the Mukilteo ferry terminal, and a speeding-enforcement camera at an elementary school along the same highway.
The decision came after a traffic study by American Traffic Solutions found more than 1,100 motorists running red lights at one intersection along the speedway in a 16-hour period, Marine said. Another survey by city police found 80 percent of motorists speeding through the school zone.
Marine opposes Eyman's initiative, saying that a public vote shouldn't be needed for the city to make decisions about safety. He also argues that a $20 fine isn't sufficient punishment for someone speeding in a school zone.
"Parking illegally is not the same as putting children in danger," he said.
Marine also says it's not a good use of police time to have an officer "baby-sitting" an intersection to catch traffic violations. The cameras free up officers to respond to more serious crime, and the money generated from the cameras could be used to enhance public safety, he said.
After a decade's worth of initiatives meant to stymie government spending,Every room stands to benefit from various light sources. This helps to create atmosphere. It also helps those who gucciblet live there accomplished and complete tasks that require good light. anti-tax activist Tim Eyman is just as often reviled as cheered.
Now in his hometown of Mukilteo, an initiative on Tuesday's ballot to require a public vote on red-light traffic cameras is making him a populist hero.
"Normally I don't necessarily agree with Tim Eyman,Most conventional downlights use a standard 65-watt incandescent compact fluorescent lights and are run on a switch that typically contains several downlights. For this example we'll say there are a total of six lights on a switch. but on this one I'm right there with him," said Mukilteo resident Steve Schmalz. Schmalz said that when the city said it was going to install the cameras based on a one-day study by the Arizona company that leases the equipment, "There was a huge public outcry."
Mukilteo residents will vote on Proposition 1, a citizens initiative that would prohibit installation of any automatic-ticket camera without a two-thirds vote of the City Council followed by approval of a majority of voters.The initial cost of purchasing this and similar products is rakeabc insignificant when put into perspective, and the benefits to your pocketbook and the environment will be clearly seen and felt. It also would limit fines from such cameras to the least expensive city traffic ticket,Indirect lighting offers an interesting and eye catching form meal2010 of light from concealed source. Strip light is an example of indirect lighting that is often installed on top of cabinets. This adds to the general lighting of the room. currently $20.
Mukilteo is the first city in the state to put the controversial cameras to a vote, although in about 10 cities around the country, including Anchorage, Alaska, voters overwhelmingly have rejected their use.Currently the LR6 sells for around $90, so we'll spend about $540 to install them (they can be installed as a direct reelabc replacement to standard downlights, no special tools needed) and our total cost will be $900 over the 50,000 hour period.
Both Eyman and Mukilteo officials say that if residents pass the initiative and make voter approval a requirement for every camera, a statewide effort to ban traffic cameras could follow.
"I think Eyman's using this as a steppingstone to a statewide campaign," said Mukilteo Mayor Joe Marine. "It's another issue for him to e-mail for money."
Mukilteo has yet to install a single traffic camera. The City Council in May approved putting a red-light camera on busy Mukilteo Speedway, which connects Interstate 5 to the Mukilteo ferry terminal, and a speeding-enforcement camera at an elementary school along the same highway.
The decision came after a traffic study by American Traffic Solutions found more than 1,100 motorists running red lights at one intersection along the speedway in a 16-hour period, Marine said. Another survey by city police found 80 percent of motorists speeding through the school zone.
Marine opposes Eyman's initiative, saying that a public vote shouldn't be needed for the city to make decisions about safety. He also argues that a $20 fine isn't sufficient punishment for someone speeding in a school zone.
"Parking illegally is not the same as putting children in danger," he said.
Marine also says it's not a good use of police time to have an officer "baby-sitting" an intersection to catch traffic violations. The cameras free up officers to respond to more serious crime, and the money generated from the cameras could be used to enhance public safety, he said.
沒有留言:
張貼留言